_edited.png)
According to a recent decree of the High Court of Delhi, the request filed in accordance with the Companies Act may be sent to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) without requiring official declaration. In Cowi India Private Limited vs. Pinnacle Air Private Limited, the court held that a written opinion of the intent to assign could be considered a request. The decision demonstrates the flexibility of the legal system in terms of procedural requirements for corporate bankruptcy, which facilitates the transfer of the High Court's operations for decisions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
Background
Cowi India Pvt Ltd initiated a company petition under the Companies Act of 1956, seeking to wind up Pinnacle Air Pvt Ltd due to unpaid invoices. Following this, Pinnacle sought to have the case moved to the NCLT in Delhi. The High Court's primary legal question was whether such a transfer required an official request. Cowi asserted that an official request was required, whilst Pinnacle argued that the high court might transfer the case without one, citing earlier legal interpretations.
Details
“Given the definite request from the respondent, and the absence of any substantial winding-up procedures, the current petition cannot persist before this Court. Therefore, the petition is transferred to the NCLT, Delhi Bench, for further action,” the court ordered.
“Recognizing the respondent's clear request for transfer and the legal precedents stating that a formal application is not essential, this Court finds no barrier in accepting the written submissions as a transfer application for the current petition to the NCLT," the Court noted.
Justice Amit Mahajan of the Delhi High Court remarked that since no significant winding-up actions had been underway, the case could be forwarded to the NCLT. The court clarified that a party's expressed transfer request within written submissions could qualify as an application. Legal representatives for both Cowi and Pinnacle presented their arguments, leading the court to ultimately approve Pinnacle’s request. This ruling clarifies that High Courts are allowed to transfer ongoing winding-up petitions to the NCLT without a separate formal application when the party's intention is clearly indicated in the records.
Significance
The decision has significant impact on the Corporate Insolvency Act. It processes the NCLT to move the winding-up petitions to become more efficient, which aligns with the legal purpose of intensifying insolvency matters under the IBC. This reduces bureaucracy obstacles and guarantees that distressed enterprises are handled within a more specialized framework. It provides clarity for cases, legal advisors and judges, which increases the NCLT's efficiency and effectiveness of handling corporate bankruptcy cases.
Conclusion
Delhi High Court ruling in Cowi India Pvt Ltd's vs Pinnacle Air Pvt Ltd sets a key precedent for corporate insolvency law. The ruling simplifies procedural requirements and allows for easier transfers to the NCLT by recognizing written submissions as valid requests for transfer. This enhances the efficiency of insolvency resolution by ensuring that businesses are evaluated within the appropriate legal context.
LinkedIn Link - https://www.linkedin.com/company/legal-soch-foundation/ 💼📚👩⚖
Telegram Link - https://t.me/+1-pfOBHo2a84MWRl
WhatsApp Link https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaT83EwJ3jv51opz