_edited.png)
The Supreme Court issued a significant directive, instructing authorities to decide within three days on applications for holding rallies on voter awareness, even amid Section 144 orders. This order follows a petition filed by social activists Aruna Roy and Nikhil Dey, challenging the routine imposition of prohibitory orders under Section 144 by District Magistrates (DMs) ahead of elections.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing Aruna Roy, argued that Section 144 cannot be invoked arbitrarily, especially to curb voter education rallies. The bench, comprising Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, responded by directing authorities to decide on rally permissions within three days of application submission.
The petitioners contended that the indiscriminate use of Section 144 during elections stifles the democratic process by preventing public gatherings and discussions. They highlighted the need for a fair and transparent electoral environment, emphasizing that blanket prohibitory orders hinder citizens' rights to participate freely in the electoral process.
The Supreme Court's order underscores the importance of upholding democratic principles and ensuring citizens' access to information and participation in elections. It reflects a judicial effort to curb the misuse of legal provisions that could undermine the democratic fabric of the country.
The matter is set to be heard again after two weeks, signaling the court's commitment to addressing issues related to electoral transparency and citizens' rights. This case exemplifies the judiciary's role in safeguarding constitutional values and ensuring accountability in the administration of electoral processes.
The petitioners' plea seeks to curb the routine imposition of Section 144 orders, which they argue are often issued without proper justification or consideration of democratic rights. They emphasize the need for a balanced approach that respects both law and fundamental rights, especially during critical electoral periods.
The Supreme Court's intervention in this matter highlights its commitment to protecting citizens' rights and promoting democratic principles. By directing authorities to promptly decide on rally permissions, the court aims to uphold the integrity of the electoral process and ensure that citizens can exercise their voting rights without undue hindrance.
LinkedIn Link - https://www.linkedin.com/company/legal-soch-foundation/ 💼📚👩⚖️
Telegram Link - https://t.me/+1-pfOBHo2a84MWRl
WhatsApp Link - https://chat.whatsapp.com/IMfN12mwJhELhOQLLFOLTb
Comments